sábado, 21 de octubre de 2023

Pierre Agostini Interview

 

My daughter called me asking, ‘Is that true, I see it on Google?’” That was how Pierre Agostini found out he had been awarded the 2023 Nobel Prize in Physics. In this conversation with Adam Smith, kindly facilitated by Dawn Larzelere of The Ohio State University (whose voice is heard at the start and end), Agostini talks of his surprise at receiving the prize now, his initial thoughts on hearing the news and recalls his pleasure at being the first to produce a train of attosecond light pulses back in 2001.

Interview transcript

Dawn Larzelere: Adam, are you there?

Adam Smith: I am.

DL: Pierre, are you there?

Pierre Agostini: I am!

DL: Awesome, I connected you two, this is great. All right.

PA: Ok!

AS: How lovely, many congratulations on the award of the Nobel Prize.

PA: Thank you, thank you so much.

AS: And you are in France, so, I think that they tried, but they could not reach you to tell you the news. How did you hear the news that you had been awarded the prize?

PA: Well, simple, my daughter called me asking “Is that true, I see it on google?” So yes, I didn’t know what to expect really. I thought it was some kind of mistake but it’s not apparently.

AS: It seems not, not at all.

PA: I’m glad to hear that.

AS: Most official. But what did you do when you found out that this was the case?

PA: I thought of going away, far from any telephone. [Laughs]

AS: [Laughs]

PA: But I guess I cannot do that completely one way or another.

AS: It’s nice for us that you don’t, but I understand the thought, because you are much in demand now. Apart from wanting to hide, what does it make you think?

PA: It makes me think that the reasons of the Nobel Committee are obscure, and why they chose to award this kind of research now is sort of a mystery. But, why not, after all. It’s a long time for me. It’s about twenty years since we did that experiment that started the attosecond stuff, but ok, better late than never.

AS: In 2001 when you produced that first train of attosecond light pulses, did you know that this was something that could perhaps one day receive a Nobel Prize?

PA: Well, ok, there was sort of a competition between the group at Saclay and our coworker Harm-Geert Muller from Amsterdam. There was a competition between us and the other two. Those two guys, Ferenc Krausz and Anne L’Huillier, so we were all in a conference, a sort of European conference and we were really happy to be the first one to announce the thing.

AS: And now the race continues, now the race is to get shorter and shorter pulses.

PA: Yes, at that time we were, I think, the first measurement was something like 400 attoseconds and now they are at 50.

AS: For those who don’t live in the world of attosecond physics, can you help people grasp just how short an attosecond is?

PA: Yes, I was once in a conference, and the guy was talking about femtoseconds, and he was comparing a nickel to the deficit of the United States. An attosecond is a one thousandth of a femtosecond, it’s very short.

AS: I like the idea of a thousandth of a nickel in comparison to the deficit of the United States, that works! It helps, you know it’s hard to get your head around it. It’s a strange question to ask, but do you think you are going to enjoy being a Nobel laureate?

PA: Not sure about that. I am a very, by the way, I am very happy for Ferenc and Anne, and please congratulate them if you talk to them on the phone.

AS: Indeed, I certainly shall. How will you celebrate the rest of today, or how will you enjoy the rest of today?

PA: That’s a good question. I will try to call my grand daughter and grand children who are in Paris at the moment and so we’ll try to get together, and sort of celebrate in the family.

AS: That sounds lovely. I wish a lovely rest of day and I hope that somehow you are able to escape at least some of the calls that come your way.

PA: Thank you, thank you. I will try.

DL: Thank you both of you, I really appreciate the time.

AS: I’ll let you two get on, thank you very much indeed Dawn for organising this. Thank you, thank you Pierre, bye bye.

DL: Of course, thank you Adam.


To cite this section
MLA style: Pierre Agostini – Interview. NobelPrize.org. Nobel Prize Outreach AB 2023. Thu. 12 Oct 2023. <https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2023/agostini/interview/>

jueves, 19 de octubre de 2023

Análisis de recursos

 





ESCALA: 0 Nada conseguido

3 Totalmente conseguido

NA Las características del recurso hacen que el criterio no sea aplicable


CALIDAD DE LOS RECURSOS EDUCATIVOS

Url:

(del recurso que vas a analizar)


CRITERIOS

DESCRIPTORES DEL CRITERIO

NA

0

1

2

3

1.Descripción didáctica

  • Objetivos didácticos

  • Estudiantes a los que va dirigido

  • Competencias que desarrolla




XXX


2.Calidad de los contenidos

  • Presentación apropiada

  • Nivel adecuado para los destinatarios

  • Información actualizada y objetiva




XXX


3.Capacidad para generar aprendizaje

  • Promueve el aprendizaje significativo 

  • Estimula el espíritu crítico y la reflexión 

  • Promueve la creatividad e innovación




XXX


4.Adaptabilidad

  • Adecuado para diferentes tipos de alumnos

  • Se ajusta a su nivel y estilos de aprendizaje

  • Explota diferentes caminos para alcanzar los objetivos





XXX

5.Interactividad

  • Asegura la interacción del alumno con el recurso

  • Actividades diversas

  • Aprendizaje es dirigido y se registra el progreso de aprendizaje





XXX

6.Motivación

  • Vinculado a las experiencias vitales del estudiante

  • Desarrolla la autonomía del alumnado

  • Presenta los contenidos de manera atractiva e innovadora





XXX

7.Formato y diseño

  • Organización clara

  • Contiene múltiples formatos (texto, imagen, audio o vídeo)

  • Recurso personalizable





XXX

8.Reusabilidad

  • Tiene módulos 

  • Posibilidad de organizar los  módulos para crear nuevos recursos

  • Módulos pueden utilizarse en diferentes materias





XXX

9.Portabilidad

  • Formato estándar

  • Puede ser utilizado con distintos dispositivos

  • Uso con o sin conexión a internet





XXX

10.Robustez; estabilidad técnica

  • Se ejecuta sin fallos y con rapidez

  • Reproduce audio y video

  • Proporciona ayuda y soluciones ante problemas





XXX

11.Estructura del escenario de aprendizaje

  • Los títulos describen el objetivo del recurso

  • Información de estos escenarios es coherente y significativa

  • Movilidad y ajuste entre los diferentes escenarios de aprendizaje





X

XX

12.Navegación

  • Los enlaces del recurso aportan información relevante

  • Funcionan correctamente

  • Aporta distintas rutas para llegar al mismo escenario de aprendizaje





X

XX

13.Operabilidad

  • Presenta atajos y/o teclas de acceso rápido

  • El medio se comporta de manera predecible y lógica

  • Puede utilizarse de forma intuitiva, clara y rápida





XXX

14.Accesibilidad del contenido audiovisual

  • Contraste adecuado

  • El usuario tiene el control de la reproducción de todos los contenidos 

  • Existen alternativas a los audiovisuales (en general son textos)





XXX

15.Accesibilidad del contenido textual

  • Puede ajustarse el tamaño del texto

  • La información se proporciona en distintos medios

  • Las tablas y listas son sencillas, con estructura clara





XXX

COMENTARIO: (Realiza una valoración global de la calidad del recurso, indica las deficiencias más Ximportantes que presenta y en qué línea lo modificarías para conseguir una mayor calidad)


El recurso evaluado se encuentra en el repositorio ProComún, siendo el siguiente https://biologia-geologia.com/libro3biogeo.html


4. Adaptabilidad: no se puede adaptar a más edades o modificar para adaptarlo de forma personal. 


7. formato y diseño: pero considero que cumple bastante el criterio evaluado. 


8. Reusabilidad: no presenta módulos. 


9. Portabilidad: No es posible usar el recurso sin conexión a internet